The Post-Journal

 

In Defense of Chuck Schumer

Local Commentaries

Mar 29, 2025

Rolland Kidder

 

Our U.S. Senator, Chuck Schumer, has come under some fairly heavy criticism in the past couple of weeks over his decision to not let the government default.

The criticisms were framed primarily by those in his own party who believed that the decision would further enable the President in his efforts at dismantling the federal government. This impression was magnified when the President, himself, thanked Schumer for lending support to the Continuing Resolution (CR) to keep the government running through September.

I am not entirely a disinterested observer in all of this, since many years ago I served with Senator Schumer when he was an Assemblyman in the New York State Assembly. While there, and in his subsequent roles in the Congress of the United States, I have found him to be honest and pragmatic in his approach to government. He also, despite having had big responsibilities in Washington, has paid attention to his Upstate New York constituents and visits each county of the state every year.

But, to get back to Senator Schumer’s decision to support the CR, I thought it made both substantive and political sense. Substantively, a government shutdown on top of all of the chaos associated with the dismantling of government and layoffs that have been going on under the leadership of the President and Elon Musk would have been devastating for the country.

On the political side of things, though more liberal members of his party wanted him to stand up to Trump and shut down the government, Schumer made the pragmatic decision that to do that would just heap political criticism on the Democrats. A shutdown would have given Republicans, who now control the levers of power in Washington, an easy scapegoat to blame Democrats for the additional chaos which would have followed with even more negative consequences.

Schumer saw through that and did his party and his country a favor by supporting passage of a bill in the Senate to keep the government running – though I am sure there was lot in it that he didn’t like

In my view, it took political courage for Schumer to do this. He is taking some short-term political flack for his position, but, in the long-run, it was the right and smart thing to do both politically and for the country.

Chuck Schumer, unlike the President, has a long history in and knowledge of how government works. In truth, government has an important role to play in our society. Sometimes it can overreach and become bloated, but what it does is address needs that the private sector does not or cannot do – like public safety, public infrastructure, a court system, public schools, food and meat inspection, environmental standards, healthcare support, running a National Park Service, maintaining roads and bridges, funding social security and the military and all of the other myriad of things that we take for granted in this great country of ours.

So, Senator Schumer, thanks for standing up and doing the right thing. You may be getting criticism from some quarters, but, for what it’s worth, your stock is still strong up here, in that part of the state north and west of the Tappan Zee Bridge – that demarcation line south of which lies the great majority of this state’s residents and voters.

 

                           The Post-Journal 

Bullying In The White House

                                                                                    Mar 8, 2025

Rolland Kidder

 

I thought I had seen it all with Donald Trump, but his atrocious behavior in bullying the President of Ukraine in the White House went beyond the pale.

Can you imagine George Washington or Abe Lincoln, or any other President we have had, ever doing anything like this? If it were done in school, the teacher would send the student involved to the principal’s office.

Actually, it was more than bullying. President Zelensky was bushwhacked between the two hammering voices of President Trump and Vice-President Vance. This was no spontaneous, unplanned event. They were out to surprise and crush the Ukrainian President in a coordinated way.

As an American, I was ashamed and embarrassed.

To Trump though, it was a victory. “This is going to be great television,” he said. An observation that fits with his general “modus operandi.”

When Tony Schwarz ghost-wrote in 1987 the book “Art of the Deal” for Trump, the publisher showed Mr. Trump a copy of what the proposed book would look like. Trump liked it, did not comment on its content, but said: “Please make my name much bigger.” That was done on the cover, and the book became a bestseller.

The same Donald Trump, our current President, now in his first chaotic days of a second term, seems to be consistent, at least on that point. Even if the news is not good, as long as the Trump name gets top billing, it is a success.

As Schwarz said in a follow-up interview after the book was published, Trump “seemed driven entirely by a need for public attention.” After spending decades as a tabloid titan, “the only thing left was running for President. If he could run for emperor of the world, he would.”

As to that ambition, unfortunately, the President may be in for a surprise. The world is not ready for an emperor, even an American emperor. We have to hope that others in the world will arise to remind us of our democratic roots and help steer us back in the direction of responsible, representative government.

The Roman philosopher, Seneca, once wrote: “Caesar and the state are one and the same.” It was opposition to that kind of thinking that brought America into being. We didn’t want Caesar or the King of England running this country.

When asked what kind of government the Constitutional Convention had proposed, Ben Franklin is purported to have said: “A Republic if you can keep it.” Now is a time when we need to be focused on “keeping it.”

Bullying a beleaguered leader of a country that was invaded and is fighting for its life as a democracy is not the American way.

Rolland Kidder is a Stow resident and a former New York state Assemblyman.

                                                            The Post-Journal

           What Happened To The Grand Old Party?           

                                                                     February 22, 2025

Rolland Kidder

 It wasn’t that long ago that the Grand Old Party (GOP) was advocating for free trade and the elimination of tariffs and trade restrictions. The party also advocated for a bi-partisan foreign policy encouraging strong relationships with our allies through alliances like NATO in order to contain Russian aggression.

Now all that seems to be gone. “We are the great United States, we are bigger and smarter than any other nation, and we will tell the world what to do. International leaders and members of military alliances which we helped create need to understand that we are now the boss.”

And, as to free trade, especially here in North America: “Forget about free trade agreements. The United States is going to slap a 25% tariff on Canada and Mexico, unless they do exactly what we tell them to do.”

Teddy Roosevelt, who, I believe, everyone would concede was a strong and outspoken President–exercised American power by “speaking softly but carrying a big stick.” Now, we speak loudly, brandish the big stick, and tell other countries that we will act for our own benefit regardless of what they think.

All of this is sad to me. This is not the America I grew up with. This is not making America great again. It is the way of banana republics and autocrats.

And, the idea that a clown like Elon Musk, can come into the government with a “meat axe” approach and actually know what he is cutting…is a joke. Apparently, it doesn’t matter that the United States Agency for International Development was created and supported by both Republican and Democratic parties in the past. Now, in the name of government efficiency, it is to be abolished by fiat from Elon Musk and the White House.

What about the program instituted by President George W. Bush to combat the epidemic of AIDS throughout the world? What about food programs when there are famines? Are not American farmers still the “bread-basket” of the world? Does America not care anymore?

Eliminating some programs because they are wasteful or inefficient could be understood, but eliminating an entire agency created by the Congress to address such issues… is just plain wrong.

The GOP now seems to have only one mantra…and that is “follow the leader.” Whatever he says goes. Wherever he leads us, we will follow. It reminds me of the Pied Piper leading a mesmerized crowd over the cliff.

Much of this new approach to government seems to be driven by inflaming fear and discord. Fear has always been an easy sell. Yet, driving wedges between people and nations has not been the American way.

Where it will all end, we don’t know.

One bright spot came last week, when a federal prosecutor with strong Republican credentials, quit her job in the Southern District of New York rather than follow orders from Washington to stop criminal charges against the Mayor of the City of New York. She viewed such orders as blatantly illegal and a violation of legal and judicial ethics.

This is what it will take to turn things around. People, like her, will have to stand up to officials in high places when they are leading us in the wrong direction.

 

                  The Post-Journal

Jimmy Carter: A Life Well-Lived

Local Commentaries

Jan 4, 2025

Rolland Kidder 

 

America lost an icon this past week…Jimmy Carter. In many ways, he was an anomaly in our national politics–a peanut farmer who came from nowhere to win the Presidency.

When I say “nowhere,” I do not mean to disrespect the people of Plains, Georgia. But, even people from Plains would never have predicted it. To bring it close to home, it would be like someone from around here predicting that Robert Jackson from Frewsburg, N.Y. would become a U.S. Attorney General, Supreme Court Justice and Chief American Prosecutor at Nuremberg.

These things just don’t happen very often.

What drew me to Carter, I expect, is just that fact–he came from the kind of rural background that I grew up in. He was what, in New York, we would call an “upstate Democrat,” and both he and his wife, Rosalynn, came and campaigned here in Western New York.

In the process, in 1980, I became a Carter delegate to the Democratic National Convention. Though his prospects for re-election didn’t look good at the time, I believed that he personified the kind of human being that we should want to have in the White House. The fact that he lost that election, has never changed my mind as to the genuine humility, kindness and goodness of this man.

A lot of things can cost people elections, but character was not one of them as far as Jimmy Carter was concerned. He was smart, strong, and, sometimes, could be a stubborn man. He was also a person of faith. He not only taught Sunday School, but he believed that the principles he was teaching there should be carried out in real life.

After the Presidency, these attributes magnified themselves. His involvement in the early days of Habitat for Humanity is a case in point. One commentator called it “the theology of the hammer.” It wasn’t good enough just be a Christian in church. You had an obligation to serve others and to work for their benefit in the wider world.

Recent comments on his passing may well remain true–that he may be the only President whose high office was a stepping-stone to something perhaps more significant. Carter could have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize just for his work as President in forging peace in the Middle East between Egypt and Israel. But, the Nobel award was also based on his post-Presidency efforts through the Carter Center in advancing health, peace and democratic initiatives throughout the world.

During the time I was involved in Washington with the World War II Memorial, I became good friends with one of Carter’s former staff leaders in the White House, Frank Moore.

After serving in the White House, Frank and his colleague, Jody Powell, stayed in the Washington area and purchased some property on the eastern shore of the Chesapeake. For 25 or 30 years, the former President would come there late in the fall for duck hunting. Carter, the country boy from Georgia, loved the out-of-doors and was a sportsman at heart. Yet, it was also the camaraderie of the hunt, and the personal friendships that surrounded it that really made it special.

Frank and the former President became good friends during those times. In 2002, Frank and Nancy Moore were invited by the Carter’s to accompany them to Oslo where Carter would receive the Nobel Prize.

Frank told me that in the week or two preceding his death, the former President remained cognizant and responsive. Rosalynn Carter died last year. She and Jimmy had been married for 77 years. As the end drew near, Jimmy Carter told those caring for him that he was ready to die and “wanted to be with Rosalynn.”

His prayer was granted. He is at peace now.

Jimmy Carter…a life well-lived.

                                           The Post-Journal

The House Of Representatives Acts

                                                                    Dec 28, 2024

                                                Rolland Kidder

 It came late in the day. As a matter of fact, it came just a few hours before midnight. But, last week, the House of Representatives acted…avoiding a federal government shutdown.

The last-minute vote wasn’t a total surprise, since tough votes are often not taken until deadlines are nearing. Yet, what made this one especially special is that, as first proposed, it was attacked by incoming President Donald Trump and his new surrogate, Elon Musk.

No one knows what will happen with Speaker Mike Johnson when the new Congress convenes. Because of the messy way in which this needed legislation ultimately passed, he may incur the wrath of Mr. Trump and not be re-elected Speaker of the House.

On the other hand, members of the House might again select him as their leader. The bare Republican majority in the new Congress, makes it even more difficult for the House to operate with just Republican votes. Despite being criticized for it, Speaker Johnson reached across the aisle for Democratic votes when that became necessary to keep the government running.

The big “bugaboo,” of course, in all of this, is the national debt. Congressmen and Presidents love to spend money though they don’t often like to raise the taxes necessary to pay for it. Debt financing is easier. This means that the national debt keeps going up, and that has meant that Congress has to keep raising the debt ceiling.

Mr. Trump has, from reports, suggested doing away with the debt ceiling altogether. That would give him (and any President) carte blanche power to take deficit spending to any level that they would want. Congress, rightly, wants to retain some control over the purse strings, and they should. That role is given to them in the Constitution.

A subplot in all of this is the part that Elon Musk will play in the new administration. He publicly supported Mr. Trump in the election and poured a lot of money into his campaign. At one rally, Mr. Trump, in introducing him said: “A new star is born, Elon Musk!”

Yet, Mr. Trump is also well known for not playing “second fiddle” to anyone. Musk needs to be careful and not overplay his hand.

Also, Musk is not known for listening to others even in his own business dealings. Working with the U.S. Congress is something he has never done. When it comes to politicians on Capitol Hill, he will be dealing with a different breed of cat. Members of Congress have been directly elected by the people. Congress has its own role to play and will not easily be pushed aside.

I have a hunch, but it is just a hunch, that Mike Johnson might actually survive and be re-elected Speaker in the new Congress. He is a likeable guy and seems to have fewer political enemies than many other potential candidates.

A big fight to select a new Speaker would also likely result in a non-functioning House of Representatives, as we saw two years ago when it took weeks to elect a Speaker. The winner of that particular contest, Kevin McCarthy, lasted only a few months before being ousted.

We need the House of Representatives to fulfill its role under the Constitution. There is little to be gained for the country if Congress again falls into chaos over electing a leader.

 

                                                  The Post-Journal

 

   On Being A Lucky Man

                                                                                    Dec 14, 2024

Rolland Kidder

 

I have always thought that one of the great moments in the history of sports was that day in 1939 in Yankee Stadium when Lou Gehrig addressed a crowd who knew that he was retiring because of a fatal disease. He said to them: “I consider myself the luckiest man on the face of the earth.”

It is hard not to feel that way on Thanksgiving.

I remember how tough it was on all of us during COVID time when we couldn’t get together. We were back to full-normal this year with 22 gathered for the big day. I have been married into this family now for over 50 years and every Thanksgiving, and every year on this day, I remember those words of Gehrig.

Thanksgiving is a national holiday and for good reason. But, for me it has always been the biggest family day of the year. It is bigger than birthdays, anniversaries or virtually anything else.

I savor it, relish it, can’t wait for it to arrive and am sad when it is over. No gift giving, no great expectations, just enjoying and observing the family and finding out what everyone is doing.

We were at our son’s home in Skaneateles, New York this year–and the town always has a Turkey Trot on Thanksgiving. You can jog or just walk. This year it was snowing…a wet, slushy, yucky kind of snow. But, that didn’t matter. The townspeople gathered as usual along with out-of-towners like us. Somebody passed the hat for the food bank in town, there were drinks and coffee, nobody was in a sour mood. Good feelings all around. Thanksgiving.

Back at home, before we left, there had been wonderful gestures leading up to the big day. The newspaper had reported on some churches and others having organized an effort to provide Thanksgiving dinners to those less fortunate. It is heartening to see all of this happening each year.

At our Thanksgivings, the family sort of has a nonstop spontaneous discussion going on of what the past year has produced…the good and the bad, but mostly about the good. This year, the biggest news was that our oldest granddaughter is pregnant, and people were speculating about how this new addition would be the center of attention next year.

Writers can sometimes be redundant, but when it comes to Thanksgiving–I don’t care. Every year I get carried away and write about it. But, it is worth the write.

Thanksgiving always brings me back to what Lou Gehrig said. He is not alone. I consider myself to be the luckiest man on the face of the earth, and that is the truth.

 

 

           The Post-Journal      

  At Last, The Election Is Over

Local Commentaries

Nov 9, 2024

Rolland Kidder

It seems like eons ago when Joe Biden was still a candidate, and the election seemed over. After the June debate, it was clear that he could no longer articulate and lead a campaign for the Presidency.

Biden eventually stepped aside, and endorsed his Vice President, Kamala Harris, to be the nominee in his stead. After that, we again had an election going on in the country.

It has been an exhausting one. Just this past week, I read a news article full of advice from a psychiatrist as to how people should deal with election angst. Now, I expect that same person is providing advice as to how supporters of Harris should deal with post-election depression.

Yet, remember, fair and free elections are central to our democracy. The silver lining for every American is that we have just undertaken another one. Some may not like the result, but all should rejoice in the fact that we had an election…and a vigorous one at that.

My own view is that Harris acquitted herself well. In the time that she had, she was able to make a case for why she should be the next President.

There were two major things, out of her control, that I believe contributed to her defeat. First, she didn’t have a lot of time to organize and establish a campaign. President Biden waited too long, until just weeks before the Democratic Convention, before stepping aside.

The second strike against her was inflation. Though the economy is now humming along, people are still upset about inflation…especially the rise in food and housing prices. The party in power always gets blamed for that, as was the case this time around.

We must also not forget that she was also running against an incumbent. Donald Trump is a former President. He has his own way of campaigning and is effective at it.

An old Republican friend contacted me about a week before the election asking who I thought would win the election. Though I sided with Harris, my response to him was: “It is still Trump’s and for him to lose.” I had no scientific basis for making that statement, except for my “gut” reaction and years of experience watching and being involved in elected politics.

Despite my dislike of his divisive approach to politics and the way he demeans his opponents, you have to admit that Donald Trump is skillful in the public arena. As one columnist said: “He bonds with supporters in an intimate, spontaneous, confessional way, unlike typical politicians….”

Now, we must hope for the best. We have seen him in action before. What will now happen with Ukraine and the Middle East? Will he go after his political enemies? Maybe… and we can hope… he will want to leave a legacy of positive accomplishment for his final term as President of the United States. We want our Presidents to succeed, not fail.

The election is over. It was not “stolen” either this time or the last time. Harris has conceded and congratulated Mr. Trump. There will be a peaceful transition of power. The people have spoken. The decision has been made. Democracy has worked its way once again. We move on from here.

 

                                                        The Post-Journal

Being On Trump’s Mailing List

                                                                                        Oct 5, 2024

Rolland Kidder

 I just received my fourth mailing from former President Trump asking for money. This one included a certificate hoping I would join him in a new “Lyin’ Kamala Harris and Crooked Joe Biden Target List.”

This list would be “my badge of courage and honor” which I could frame, if I want to, and hang in a prominent place in my home. Of course, the name “Trump” is at the top of this list since he says that these two Democrats hate him, and “they hate you, too.”

“The Radicals, Socialists, Communists, and Globalists around them–are out to get me because I am fighting for you.” Etc. etc.

He then urged me to send a contribution suggesting nine different amounts ranging from $35 to $3,300, and signs it: “God Bless America, Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States.”

A couple of questions may arise in your mind. First, why would such a piece of hate/fear directed mail even be sent to me? The answer to that, I believe, is that I have been known to split my ticket when voting and, on occasion, have contributed to the campaigns of Republicans. Mr. Trump may have misconstrued that into my being a supporter of all Republicans, including him.

Perhaps this mailing list I am now on came from the fact that in the past I had supported our former Congressman, Amo Houghton, a stalwart Republican, who was a good friend and an exceptional Representative for the Southern Tier in the Congress.

If that is the case, I am sure that Amo must be “turning in his grave.” In my last conversation with him before he died, he was outraged that Donald Trump with his divisive rhetoric had taken control of the Republican Party… a political institution which Houghton loved and had been affiliated with for his whole life.

A second question may be: “When did the Democrats become “radicals, socialists and communists?” The answer is that they aren’t and never have been. These are just made-up words to stir up more disunity and fear.

The only other time in our history which compares to ours currently, in my view, was in the 1840’s and ‘50s. The Whig Party was taken over by fear mongers who were warning that immigrants, Catholics, Jews, foreigners, etc. were trying to take over the country. Whigs became known as the “Know Nothing Party,” and eventually disappeared from the face of our political landscape. A new party was born, the Republican Party, opposed to the extension of slavery into the new and expanding territories of the West. This Party, under Lincoln, fought a Civil War over the issue. After that, it developed its traditional conservative, pro-business policies as the nation expanded.

Can that Republican Party again find its roots? Can it again become a party advocating for smaller government, engagement in bi-partisan foreign policy (not isolationism,) and in advancing pro-business policies. Can it move away from demanding allegiance to only one person, and from the politics of vitriol, personal attacks and target lists?

In large measure, that is what this current election is all about.

And, if you are wondering whether or not I sent in any money to be on this special target list…the answer to that is “not one thin dime.”

 

                        The Post-Journal

    The Contest Is Now Joined

                                                                                    Sep 14, 2024

Rolland Kidder

I mentioned several weeks ago that Joe Biden, in the June debate, had shown that he was incapable of running again a national campaign for the Presidency. Mr. Biden eventually came to the same conclusion and removed himself from the race.

This week there was another debate, and it was clear, no matter whom you favored, that we now again have a viable campaign underway for this highest office in our land. The contest is now joined.

To be honest, it would be a stretch to actually call what we saw a “debate.” It was more a verbal boxing match than an in-depth analysis of issues facing the country. The country knew what to expect from former President Trump. What we didn’t know is how Vice President Harris would hold up under the pressure and scrutiny of it.

I think it is safe to say that, in that respect, she did just fine. She went “toe-to-toe” with the former President. She held her own and let him be himself.

Ever since the first televised Presidential debate between Richard Nixon and John F. Kennedy, it has become evident that these so-called “debates” are really more performance contests than anything else. Though issues were debated more thoughtfully in that first debate, the “winner,” so called, was deemed to be Mr. Kennedy because he looked sharper and more articulate in presenting his views. Mr. Nixon seemed to be tired and not as much at ease as Mr. Kennedy.

In other words, one candidate performed better than the other.

Another performance that I remember was that between President Reagan and former Vice President Mondale. The press and the pundits had been hyping the issue of President Reagan’s age, as compared to the younger Mr. Mondale. President Reagan put that down with one sentence, promising early in the debate that he “would not make Mr. Mondale’s age an issue in this election.” Everyone laughed and after that, Ronald Reagan cruised to re-election.

Nonetheless, what all of this points to is what I think is really an evident weakness in our political system. Every four years, we choose our Presidents from a very narrow field–usually, it comes down to only two people, as to who will lead our executive branch of government.

One advantage I see in other democracies–like most countries in Europe–is that the political leader of the country emerges after many years of serving in a parliament where they can be vetted and evaluated by their peers. In our country, you can come out of nowhere with a slogan and lot of money, with no political experience, and become President of the United States.

Yet, our system is what it is. The Constitution set it up this way, and so every four years we again go through these election campaigns. In order to “protect” the process and secure the support of the smaller states, the Constitutional Convention also set up the mechanism of the Electoral College. Though this seems archaic today and can allow a candidate with fewer popular votes win the Presidency– unless changed by constitutional amendment (which is not easy,) the Electoral College will likely be with us for many years to come.

So–the campaign has now begun with all the hoopla and political advertising that goes with it. Sit back and “enjoy” –or, at least, bear with it. It will be over in less than two months!