One day, when I was in the State Assembly, I had an
interesting conversation with another Assemblyman who represented Harlem. “How many people voted in your District in
the last election?” I asked. He said,
“about 10,000.” I was astounded, for in the
same election, 40,000 people had voted in my Assembly District here in
Chautauqua County and the population represented in each District was roughly
the same.
Out of curiosity, I checked on some voting numbers for 2018,
and found similarities. For example, in
our Congressional District, in the general election, Tom Reed received about
130,000 votes and Tracy Mitrano 110,000 votes… a total of 240,000 for a
participation rate of about 60% of the 400,000 active registered voters in the
District. By comparison, in the general
election, the much-touted new Congresswoman from the Bronx & Queens,
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, crushed her Republican opponent by a total of 110,000
to 20,000. Yet, it was with a turn-out
rate of only 44% out of 320,000 active registered voters in her District.
17,000 voters out of some 320,000 in that Primary District decided who the next Representative in Congress would be.
In the case of Cortez, the “real” election came a few months
earlier in the Democratic Primary where she beat an incumbent Congressman, Joe
Crowley, by a vote of 17,000 to 13,000. (The Republican Party, in most of New York
City, is not a significant political force so the ultimate election winner is
usually determined in the Democratic Primary.)
When you think of it that way, 17,000 voters out of some 320,000 in that
District (or about 5% of the total number of active registered voters) decided
in the Democratic Primary who the next Representative in Congress would be.
That is an important fact to be considered before people
become taken with the idea that Ms. Cortez is leading a “new wave” of
progressive thought which is sweeping the country. My own view of the
Cortez/Crowley race is that the Congressional District had become ethnically more
Hispanic… and that was a major factor in determining the outcome of the
Democratic Primary.
No one is alleging any wrong doing in the process, but it
does illustrate how low participation rates can skew an election. It also should provide some perspective that
there was no “landslide” victory equating to a big public mandate. Of course, there was no “landslide” either in the
last Presidential election where Donald Trump lost the popular vote but won in
the Electoral College… but that doesn’t mean that he can’t assert that there
was.
We can hold our heads a bit high here in the Southern Tier where 240,000 people showed up.
But, back to voter participation: we can hold our heads a
bit high here in the Southern Tier of New York where 240,000 people showed up
in a contested general election to vote for a Member of Congress… a 60%
participation rate of all active registered voters. I wish that our voter participation rate was higher
but, here in this Congressional District, we are still beating a lot of other
places when it comes to exercising our right to vote.
Rolland Kidder
This commentary originally appeared in The Post-Journal