Naval History Magazine
Admiral William Halsey, Commander, Third Fleet On the bridge of
his flagship, USS New Jersey (BB-62), while en route to carry out raids on the
Philippines, December 1944.
(NAVAL HISTORY AND HERITAGE COMMAND)
Under the Radar:
Admiral Halsey at the End of World War II (Part I)
For the two weeks before the official surrender, Admiral
Halsey had a new boss, the newly named Supreme Commander General Douglas
MacArthur.
By Rolland Kidder
October 2022
Naval History Magazine
ARTICLE
In researching the World War II activities of an old friend,
Ambassador F. Haydn Williams, it became evident to me that aside from U.S. Navy
efforts at finding and rescuing American POWs in Japan, there seemed to be
little information about what the Navy was doing in the two weeks leading up to
the formal Japanese surrender on 2 September 1945. What was happening with the
3rd Fleet, one of largest naval fleets ever assembled, during this two-week
period?
15 August to 2 September
In his 1947 autobiography, Admiral William F. “Bull” Halsey
reveals the time gap of the two-plus weeks that followed the 15 August announcement
by the Japanese Emperor that Japan was quitting the war. There are five pages
in Halsey’s book covering this time, with only general references to what was
happening with the 3rd Fleet.1 The formal surrender ceremony would not be held until
2 September 1945 on board the USS Missouri (BB-63)—a long time
to be sitting on your hands if you were Bull Halsey. On 14 August, Halsey’s
forces were still attacking the main Japanese island of Honshu. The next day,
one of the most massive fleets ever formed was quiet, yet still steaming off
the coast of its once mortal enemy.
An analysis of the fleet messages sent and received during
this time, as revealed in Admiral Chester Nimitz’ Gray Book, are
telling. Nimitz described the movements of the 3rd Fleet innocuously on 20
August as “continuing to replenish and reform today.”2 A
similar non-specific description was noted for 22 August: “Units of the 3rd
Fleet have completed replenishment, have reformed for the pending operation,
and are operating at economical speed, in areas assigned.”3 In
fact, Halsey and the 3rd Fleet were cruising under the radar of most of the
world. They were now working with the new Supreme Allied Commander for Allied
Powers in the Pacific, General Douglas MacArthur, in implementing the early
stages of the occupation of defeated Japan.
Aside from the beginning of efforts to find American POWs in
Japan, Halsey’s book reveals little about what happened between 15 August and
when the fleet entered Sagami Bay on 28 August and then
Tokyo Bay on 29 August. The autobiography almost seems to jump from 15 August
to the 2 September surrender ceremony where, according to Halsey: “Newsreels
show MacArthur putting his arm around my shoulders at this moment and
whispering to me. . . ‘Start ’em now!’ I said, ‘Aye, aye sir!’”4 Where,
upon Halsey’s signal, soon was heard the growing thunder of the hundreds of
Navy planes and Army Air Corps B-29s that roared overhead, culminating in what
Theodore White, in In Search of History, described as the most
incredible show of air power in human history:
Four
hundred B-29s, the fire-bombers that had leveled Japan, had taken off from Guam
and Saipan hours before. . . . came, low, low over the Missouri,
and fifteen hundred fleet planes rose above and around their wings. There they
were, speckling the sky in flocks of scudding gray; it was American power at
zenith. They dipped over the Missouri, passed on over Yokohama,
inland over Tokyo to brandish the threat, then back out to sea again. . . The
planes paraded their triumph over Tokyo Bay as Caesar’s legionnaires had
paraded theirs in Rome. . . . It was the supreme moment of air power.5
U.S. Navy carrier planes fly in formation over USS Missouri (BB-63)
during the surrender ceremonies, 2 September 1945. (Naval History and Heritage
Command)
“Aye, aye, Sir!” says a lot. For those two plus weeks before
the official surrender, Admiral Halsey had a new boss, the newly named Supreme
Commander General Douglas MacArthur. Halsey had delivered a lot for MacArthur
in those two weeks, much of it lost in the euphoria at the war’s end and in the
fog of history. Leaving his own autobiography vague about most of what had
happened in those two weeks is also part of that story. There was room for only
one principal actor in postwar Japan, and that was Douglas MacArthur. That
meant that Halsey’s other “boss,” U.S. Navy Commander in Chief Pacific
(CINPAC,) Chester W. Nimitz, would be taking a back seat. It also meant that
everyone in the chain-of-command, including “Bull” Halsey, would defer to the
new Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers when it came to writing the history
of the war’s end.
Nimitz and MacArthur
There has never been much controversy over the fact that
Chester Nimitz and Douglas MacArthur did not like each other. It would be hard
to confine two such powerful men in any room. Their antipathy toward each other
was partially personality-driven—with MacArthur as the showman and
self-promoter; and Nimitz the more reserved and quiet one. But at its core,
their relationship was characterized by an ongoing four-year power struggle
about who would command the Pacific War.
Initially, Nimitz had prevailed and drawn lines isolating
MacArthur’s dominance to the “Southwest Pacific Area,” which included
Australia, New Guinea, and the Philippines. Nimitz maintained control over the
vast “Central Pacific,” which included Midway, the Marshall Islands, and the
now-famous battlefields of Guam, Saipan, and Iwo Jima. But by mid-year 1945,
the war was coming to an end and the outcome was a foregone conclusion—Japan
would either surrender or be destroyed in one last Allied invasion of its main
islands. Plans had to be made for a postwar Japan.
Halsey had been home in 1945. He and Raymond Spruance
alternately controlled what was called the 3rd Fleet under Halsey and then renamed
the 5th Fleet when Spruance was in command. Halsey needed a break from the war,
but the Navy also wanted him home to talk about the big picture. He was sent
east to Washington, where he met with military leaders such as Admiral Ernest
King and General George Marshall. He also spent an hour at the White House with
President Franklin D. Roosevelt. In these discussions, there undoubtedly were
conversations about the war coming to an end, and what potential roles Halsey
might need to play.
Halsey was a person people liked, and he liked people. He
was not one to burn bridges, but rather build relationships. In his early Navy
days, he had first met then-Assistant Secretary of the Navy Roosevelt while on
training maneuvers with his destroyer off the coast of New England in 1913. He
had reluctantly given the Secretary the helm of the ship but found out
Roosevelt was “a nearly ‘professional sailorman,’ handling the ship with skill
and sparking an acquaintance between the Navy man and patrician politician.”6 He would
meet Roosevelt again later, after the United States entered the war against
Germany in World War I.
Army vs. Navy
There was probably not a doubt in Washington that the Army would be in charge in postwar Japan. This is one of things armies do—they occupy defeated territory. Coupled with that was the realization there was no American military leader as familiar with the Far East as Douglas MacArthur. He had lived in the Philippines for years as chief advisor to the Philippine Military while the country was still under American control. As the outlook for war worsened, he was recalled to active duty by the U.S. Army. MacArthur was born and bred Army. His father was a Medal of Honor winner from the Civil War. MacArthur had been raised on Army posts, had attended West Point, and had distinguished himself on the battlefield in World War I—and he was good at letting the press and public know of his military pedigree.
In addition, there was MacArthur’s own political ambition.
His name had been touted from time to time as a possible presidential
candidate, speculation which he did not discourage. Looking toward running
himself in 1948, it surely occurred to President Harry S. Truman that it would
not be easy for MacArthur to run for national office if he was tied up in
rebuilding a defeated Japan. To cap it all off, MacArthur would now be called
the “Supreme Commander” for the Allied Powers in the Pacific, an apt title for
a big ego. Though it must have been a hard pill to swallow, Nimitz knew it was
not going to be him after a trip to the West Coast in early July 1945. When
President Truman announced MacArthur’s appointment, Nimitz sent a message to
General MacArthur on 15 August: “Please accept my hearty congratulations on
your appointment as Supreme Commander for the occupation of JAPAN and my
assurance of full support of the forces and resources available to me.”7 If
MacArthur ever responded, it is not listed in Nimitz’s Gray Book.
The Postwar Years
In style and approach, the postwar years mimicked these same
traits in Nimitz and MacArthur. MacArthur published his memoirs; Nimitz never
did. Nimitz did compile a list of messages and fleet summary activities that he
had sent or received during the war years. Called the Nimitz Gray Book,
reading it is a slog for even the most dedicated researchers. The messages
generally follow chronologically in four separate sections—at least that is the
organization as compiled by Nimitz in the time period of this analysis,
July–August 1945. Today, all have been declassified. Some were “Top Secret” and
“Nimitz Only” messages. Some entries were summaries of naval actions that were
happening throughout the Pacific. There are more than 3,000 pages in the Gray
Book. Yet they do not include every message or briefing summary sent and
received by Admiral Nimitz and his command. Nimitz selected the messages to be
included, leaving the reader/researcher the job of trying to connect all the
dots.
In addition to his memoirs, titled Reminiscences,
MacArthur’s history of the Pacific war written with his approval, was published
by the U.S. Army after his death. Released in 1966, it was a
self-congratulatory tome of more than 450 pages titled Reports of
General MacArthur: The Campaigns of MacArthur in the Pacific. General
Harold K. Johnson, U.S. Army Chief of Staff, inserted this disclaimer in the
foreword:
While
he lived, General MacArthur was unwilling to approve the reproduction and
dissemination of the Reports, because he believed they
needed further editing and correction of some inaccuracies. His passing permits
publication but not the correction he deemed desirable. In publishing them, the
Department of the Army must therefore disclaim any responsibility for their
accuracy. But the Army also recognizes that these volumes have substantial and
enduring value, and it believes the American people are entitled to have them
made widely available through government publication.8
In other words, what we are reading in the Reports is
100-percent Douglas MacArthur, his view of history, and of himself. To give one
a sense of how much MacArthur is the focus of this book, it is worth reading
the rendition of how he landed in Japan at the Atsugi airfield on 30 August
1945:
Shortly
after 1400 a famous C-54—the name “Bataan” in large letters on its nose—circled
the field and glided in for a landing. From it stepped General MacArthur,
accompanied by General Sutherland and his other staff officers. The Supreme
Commander’s first words to General Eichelberger and the men of the Eighth Army
and the 11th Airborne Division who greeted him were:
From
Melborne to Tokyo is a long road. It has been a long and hard road, but this
looks like the payoff. The surrender plans are going splendidly and completely
according to previous arrangements. In all outlying areas, fighting has
practically ceased.
In
this area a week ago, there were 300,000 troops which have been disarmed and
demobilized. The Japanese seem to be acting in complete good faith. There is
every hope of the success of the capitulation without undue friction and
without unnecessary bloodshed.9
It could not have been scripted any better had it been
written by a Hollywood screenwriter. The Reports are testament
in themselves as to why William Manchester titled his book on MacArthur The
American Caesar.
That is who MacArthur thought he was. He wanted the American
occupation of Japan to be Army only, or at least primarily Army, and he wanted
to be seen as the liberator. Yet, he was confronted by the reality that at the
time of the surrender, the primary American presence around the main Japanese
islands was in the hands of his old nemesis, Nimitz, and the U.S. Navy.
Anticipating a Japanese surrender, the U.S. Joints Chiefs of Staff had issued
an opinion giving the Navy a prominent role in the initial days, which stated:
It
appears to JCS that immediate naval occupation of critical ports of Japan is
desirable to include in each case, if practical, an operational airfield to
facilitate communication and permit airborne landings. . . In order to produce
a continuity of policy of procedure in dealing with the Japanese Imperial
Headquarters or its Ministries a representative of General MacArthur will be
designated to perform this function until General MacArthur has actually landed
in Japan and personally assumed this responsibility. The foregoing provisions
will not be allowed to interfere with conduct of local surrenders by Naval or
other U.S. commanders concerned.10
It is interesting to note the date given to this “JCS
Study,” as it was called: 21 July 1945. It was becoming clear to the Joint
Chiefs by mid-July that the war was coming to a close. How would an occupation
of Japan be handled? Though the JCS Study made efforts to mollify MacArthur,
that didn’t mean he liked it. On 13 August, Nimitz’s representative, Vice Admiral Forrest
Sherman, sent his boss a message from Manila, where he had been meeting with
MacArthur on the expected surrender of the Japanese and the upcoming
occupation:
[MacArthur]
reiterated in most emphatic terms his disapproval of the use of a fleet landing
force prior to the arrival of troops in strength and prior to the clearance of
Japanese forces from the area under armistice arrangements. This disapproval is
based on both military grounds and effect on service relationships.11
Forrest Sherman was a traveling man. Since MacArthur didn’t
want to fly to Guam, nor Nimitz to Manila, it became Sherman’s role to fly back
and forth from Guam to Manila to try to negotiate the fine line between Navy
and Army roles in the surrender and occupation of Japan. Sherman had gone to
Manila earlier on 29 July and, at that time, had sent a similar message to Admiral
Charles “Soc” McMorris, Chief-of-Staff to Nimitz, back in Guam:
Cordially
received. Had long and very amicable conference with General MacArthur. He
accedes to naval features and to naval and air show of force as soon as
fighting stops. He considers it unwise to risk landing any marines or seizing
airfields until troops arrive in strength. He had the JCS message but did not
consider it a directive and has asked for one.
Unless
I receive other instructions, I will adjust plans to make all early landings
contingent operations with timing to be determined later . . . . 12
The message was clear: MacArthur was not interested in any
naval landing forces going ashore in Japan before he and the Army arrived.
It is interesting also that Sherman’s message to McMorris on 29 July had been sent on Navy communications only—it had gone out under the name of COM7THFLEET (Kincaid’s command) to CINCPAC ADVANCE HQ in Guam. McMorris messaged back a few hours later: “Do not concur that landing of marines or occupying airfields must be deferred until troops land in strength.” And then these words, which may have opened the door for a solution: “The naval officer on the spot must be free to act expeditiously to cope with any existing situation. Trust your skill and judgement to avoid this question becoming an issue in current discussion . . .”13 Ultimately, this response would open a solution that MacArthur could accept. If that “naval officer on the spot” were one William F. Halsey, it was probably a provision that he could live with.
The Supreme Commander
As noted earlier, the issue of naval
forces seizing ports and airfields had been addressed again at the 13 August
meeting in Manila, with neither side giving way. Sherman would go back to
Manila one more time, three days later on 16 August, this time to meet with the
Japanese representatives sent by the Emperor. There was a new reality now.
General Douglas MacArthur had become “Supreme Commander.” The message traffic
is not clear exactly how it happened, but the Navy, as it related to the
occupation of the main Japanese islands had now come under MacArthur’s control.
There would now be landings of Americans at certain Japanese ports and
airfields prior to the “landings in force” as had been earlier envisioned by
MacArthur. The landing parties would be termed “advance parties,” “garrison
forces,” or as some type of minor force. They would be primarily Navy and
Marine forces, and they would be directed by that naval officer in command who
had earned the respect and trust of Douglas MacArthur—William F. Halsey.
1. ADM William Frederick Halsey, USN, Admiral
Halsey’s Story (New York: Whittlesey House, 1947), 222–27.
2. Command Summary of Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz (Gray
Book), vol. 8, 3307.
3. Command Summary of Fleet Admiral Chester W.
Nimitz, 3308.
4. Halsey, Admiral Halsey’s Story, 229.
5. Theodore White, In Search of History (New
York: Harper Collins, 1978), 230.
6. Thomas Hughes, Admiral Bill Halsey: A Naval Life (Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press, 2016), Kindle location 1247 of 9240.
7. Command Summary of Fleet Admiral Chester W.
Nimitz, 3349.
8. Reports of General MacArthur: The Campaigns of MacArthur
in the Pacific, vol. 1, iii.
9. Reports of General MacArthur: The Campaigns of
MacArthur in the Pacific, vol. 1, 453. 10. 10. Message
of United States Joint Chiefs of Staff, 21 July 1945 (then classified
Top Secret), Marshall Foundation.
11. Command Summary of Fleet Admiral Chester W.
Nimitz, 3517.
12. Command Summary of Fleet Admiral Chester W.
Nimitz, 3502.
13. Command Summary of Fleet
Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, 3419.
No comments:
Post a Comment